Vinoski's point

Don Box's Spoutlet

Syndication

Based on Steve's most recent blog entry, I have a feeling that we are are talking past one another.
 
Let me go on the record as being very "pro-modularity" and "anti-monolith" with respect to implementation approaches in this space. Both Indigo and IIS7 are built on an open interceptor/pipeline model.
 
My questions related to introducing another container model have been relative to the developer-facing surface area of the platform, not on how a given vendor implements this stuff.
 
Steve is a brilliant engineer.  I'd be shocked if he needed to give the highly-modular Artix an enema in order to support yet another JCP-mandated API. 
 
I do have a hard time seeing how the Java developer community is served by yet another programming/management/deployment model for writing hosted code. 
 
Of course, I've always believed that the Java folks found the sweet spot with the Servlet+JDBC combination back in the 1990's, so I've obviously got very questionable taste.

Posted Jul 09 2005, 08:58 PM by don-box

Comments

Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff wrote JBI Discussion
on 07-10-2005 12:51 AM
Lots of links on JBI: IONA’s Eric Newcomer Microsoft’s Don Box Cape Clear’s Annrai O’Toole ServiceMix (and Groovy and ActiveSOAP and …) contributor James Strachan IONA’s Steve Vinoski (with a reply from Don Box again) Confirmed by a recent discussion at work, I think a lot of the confusion around JBI is due to the amazingly stupid name (making it...

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?