login
my ps
about
contact
home
instructor-led training
online training
blogs
Don Box's Spoutlet
»
Snell's recap of Tilkov's recap of several QCon talks
Snell's recap of Tilkov's recap of several QCon talks
Don Box's Spoutlet
Home
Contact
Pluralsight Blogs
Scott Allen
Craig Andera
Mark Baciak
Don Box
Keith Brown
David Cowles
Tim Ewald
Jon Fancey
Jon Flanders
Kirill Gavrylyuk
Ian Griffiths
Martin Gudgin
Mike Henderson
Dr. Joe Hummel
Jim Johnson
Kevin Jones
Sahil Malik
Matt Milner
Ted Neward
Fritz Onion
Pluralsight
Brian Randell
Jeffrey Schlimmer
Aaron Skonnard
David Starr
Dan Sullivan
Doug Walters
Jim Wilson
Mike Woodring
Syndication
RSS for Posts
Atom
RSS for Comments
Email Notifications
Go
Recent Posts
Paul Vick relocates to Oslo
Schlimmerblog
eWeek piece on Oslo
Another Oslo talk
Managed Extensibility Framework (MEF) - now with source code!
Tags
.NET
DSL
MEF
Microsoft
Microsoft Solver Foundation
Modeling
MSF
Oslo
PDC
View more
Oslo
Doug Purdy
Chris Anderson
Gudge
Chris Sells
Jeff Schlimmer
Randy Kimmerly
Super Ninja
Archives
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (4)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (6)
May 2008 (3)
April 2008 (1)
February 2008 (4)
January 2008 (6)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (13)
October 2007 (9)
August 2007 (3)
May 2007 (6)
April 2007 (2)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (2)
January 2007 (13)
December 2006 (8)
October 2006 (2)
August 2006 (1)
July 2006 (3)
June 2006 (11)
May 2006 (15)
April 2006 (6)
March 2006 (7)
February 2006 (2)
January 2006 (9)
December 2005 (13)
November 2005 (4)
October 2005 (12)
September 2005 (15)
August 2005 (7)
July 2005 (32)
June 2005 (10)
May 2005 (8)
April 2005 (18)
March 2005 (4)
February 2005 (24)
January 2005 (5)
December 2004 (6)
November 2004 (20)
October 2004 (24)
September 2004 (5)
James Snell chews on the raw notes from Stefan
here
.
I like a lot of what James has to say.
Posted
Nov 10 2007, 02:55 PM
by
don-box
Comments
Mariela-In-Bel-la-Vue
wrote
re: Snell's recap of Tilkov's recap of several QCon talks
on 11-11-2007 5:56 AM
I much prefer the second one of his notes, it is more direct. First part of his notes needs filtering and is too wide to focus on for any specific problem as a guideline or similar
Anyway, it seems that after 7 years of playing around, inventing, specifying, complicating, marketing and selling the SOAP, REST, XML, SOA, and WS hype we are realising that it is never going to be suitable for a number of important domains/problems.
Frankly I was shocked by the state of levitation of SOA chasing crowd recently, they absolutelly believe in 'dynamic, magic, middleware, loosely, long-running' business models and BizTalks and J2EE-derivatives solving the world hunger problem.
While it was inspiring to hear a few of them say, sure it is NOT suitable for X, Y and Z industry or businesses, somehow they still retain the belief support, integration and business machinery will hold up the frenzy while the costs involved in infrastructure are massive and often create more problems than SOA or HTTP or REST in themselves solve.
But "told myself so"! :-)
PHP just cost MS, what was it, 100s of million dollars, whether you call that Simple-On-Account, Real-Easy-Spending-Transfer money model or Request/Response, Chunked Encoding or similar nonsense..
Not frameworks, not mothership architectures, not middleware nor idealisms.
Ideas only.
James Snell
wrote
re: Snell's recap of Tilkov's recap of several QCon talks
on 11-11-2007 6:56 PM
> "First part of his notes needs filtering and is too wide to focus on for any specific problem as a guideline or similar"
Yeah, it really was a kind of stream-of-thoughts kind of post. I was short on time and wanted to at least get the thoughts down.
Rn 2
wrote
re: Snell's recap of Tilkov's recap of several QCon talks
on 11-12-2007 7:21 AM
Wasn't meant as a criticism at all.. I love looking at such 'streams of thoughts', they work very well as a reminder at least.. to an extent I believe they are unlike any other slow, structured, handy, precise, linked etc, annotation method.
Sure, difficult to get them down "right on the button" or for them to be "universal", problem specific etc.
The entry is indeed full of information, it is somehow pretty well structured and concise, at least so we can get the context from the early SOAP and pre-Google days and how it all changed. Probably my favourite comment I have seen this year is right there: "that's it, a byte" one.
Please keep it up..
Add a Comment
Name:
(required)
Website:
(optional)
Comments
(required)
Remember Me?
home
instructor-led training
online training
blogs
781.749.9238 (East Coast) | 310.251.9901 (West Coast) | Pluralsight, LLC , 185 Lincoln St., Suite 305, Hingham, MA 02043-1741
Copyright © 2008 Pluralsight LLC. All rights reserved.
designed by
nukeation