<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Code me up, code me down - All Comments</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>re: WCF Custom Security Tokens</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/16/28046.aspx#49977</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:49977</guid><dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator><description>OK alternatively you can have your SecurityTokenParameters class extend UserNameSecurityTokenParameters. WSDL generation works then!&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=49977" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Custom Security Tokens</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/16/28046.aspx#49972</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:49972</guid><dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator><description>I create my own binding element by extending BindingElement for this purpose. &lt;br&gt;But then WCF does not recognize as it a security binding element even if this element wraps a SecurityBindingElement element, and the custom Client and Service credentials are never called. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So should SecurityBindingElement be extended?&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=49972" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Service Authorization with Claims </title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#49317</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:49317</guid><dc:creator>xyz</dc:creator><description>very complex, i don't understand.&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=49317" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Service Authorization with Claims </title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#38360</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:38360</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Brilliant article Thomasz,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you tell me the advantages using the claim based method over the method outlined by Steve Eichert &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.emxsoftware.com/Indigo-WCF/WCF+Extensibility+Behaviors+and+Inspectors&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks greatly,&lt;br&gt;JH&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38360" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Custom Security Tokens</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/16/28046.aspx#32600</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:32600</guid><dc:creator>Tomasz Janczuk</dc:creator><description>Security policy export/import is not extensible at this moment. At the same time, since WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 generation is not trivial in a general case, it is desired to reuse existing framework for scoped extensibility scenarios like custom security token types. One way of accomplishing this is to:&lt;br&gt;1. Implement a custom BindingElement which wraps a SecurityBindingElement and implements IPolicyExportExtension. &lt;br&gt;2. In IPolicyExportExtension.ExportPolicy:&lt;br&gt;2.a. temporarily modify the SecurityTokenParameters from the custom ones to ones WCF recognizes&lt;br&gt;2.b. delegate the call to SecurityBindingElement.ExportPolicy and have the policy generated&lt;br&gt;2.c. perform targeted modifications of the generated policy to change the security token requirement. &lt;br&gt;2.d. revert the security token parameters back to the custom ones on the wrapped SecurityBindingElement. &lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Custom Security Tokens</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/16/28046.aspx#32587</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:32587</guid><dc:creator>Pedro Felix</dc:creator><description>I'm unable to generate the WSDL of the service, since it is using a non &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; token - the method SecurityPolicy11.CreateTokenAssertion throws an exception because it doesn't recognizes the SecurityTokenParameters.&lt;br&gt;I suppose I have to define a custom policy exporter for the UsernameKeySecurityToken. How can this be done?&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32587" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Service Authorization with Claims </title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#32082</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:32082</guid><dc:creator>Tomasz Janczuk</dc:creator><description>If this is not a production scenario, you can use makecert.exe to create your own certificate for testing purposes. Certificates created by makecert allow data encryption by default. &lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32082" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WCF Service Authorization with Claims </title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#32072</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:32072</guid><dc:creator>latch</dc:creator><description>Tomasz, I wonder if you can help me. I'm trying to obtain a digital certificate that I can use in a b2b scenario and am having a great deal of difficulty getting one. I've used verisign's digital certificate for emails but this does not work with wse3 because data encryption has not been enabled on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any clues?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;Latch&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32072" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>WCF Custom Security Tokens</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#28047</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:28047</guid><dc:creator>Code me up, code me down</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28047" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds: June 15, 2006 PM edition</title><link>http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/tjanczuk/archive/2006/06/15/27746.aspx#27921</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d057c89c-07b5-4bfb-b52f-d79d1e3ece89:27921</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=27921" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>